JUS289-2-A / International Civil Procedure

Principal Works

1. Paul Beaumont/Peter McEleay, A.E. Anton. Private International Law, 3^rd edition 2011, W. Green: Edinburgh (UK),
pp. 69-87, 127-135, 359-367

2. Trevor C. Hartley, International Commercial Litigation, 2009 (Reprint 2010), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (UK),
pp. 11-17, 21-31, 163-173, 319-321, 477-478

3. Ulrich Magnus/Peter Mankowski (eds.), Brussels I Regulation, 2^nd edition 2012, sellier: Munich (Germany)
pp. 4-46, 76-82, 332-333, 365-369, 436-455, 609-620, 730-736

4. Ulrich Magnus/Peter Mankowski (eds.), Brussels II bis Regulation, 2012, sellier: Munich (Germany)
pp. 5-21, 41-49

5. David McClean/Verónica Ruiz Abou-Nigm, Morris. The Conflict of Laws, originally by J.H.C. Morris, 8^th edition 2012, Thomson Reuters/Sweet & Maxwell: London (UK)
pp. 86-92, 103-105, 159-168

6. Paul Beaumont, International Family Law in Europe - the Maintenance Project, the Hague Conference and the EC: A Triumph of Reverse Subsidiarity, RabelsZ 73 (2009), 509-546

7. Anatol Dutta, The europeanisation of international succession law, in Katharina Boele-Woelki/Jo Miles/Jens Scherpe (eds.), The future of family property in Europe, 2011, Intersentia: Cambridge (UK), pp. 341-367

Further Reading

1. Paul Beaumont/Emma Johnston, Can Exequatur be Abolished in Brussels I Whilst Retaining a Public Policy Defence? Journal of Private International Law ( J. Priv. Int. L.) 6 (2010), 249-279

2. Simon Camilleri, Article 23: Formal Validity, Material Validity or Both? Journal of Private International Law ( J. Priv. Int. L.) 7 (2011), 297-320

3. Gilles Cuniberti/Isabelle Rueda, Abolition of Exequatur. Adressing the Commision’s Concerns, RabelsZ 75 (2011), 286-316

4. William Duncan, The Hague Convention of 23 November 2007 on the international recovery of child support and other forms of family maintenance, YbPIL 10 (2008), 313-331

5. Burkhard Hess, The Brussels I Regulation: recent Case Law of the Court of Justice and the Commission’s Proposed Recast, CMLRev. 49 (2012), 1075-1112

6. Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Comments on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and authentic instruments in matters of succession and the creation of a European Certificate of Succession, RabelsZ 74 (2010) 522–720

7. Peter Arnt Nielsen, The New Brussels I Regulation, CMLRev. 50 (2013), 503-528

8. Tena Ratković/Dora Zgrabljićrotar, Choice-of-Court Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation (Recast), Journal of Private International Law ( J. Priv. Int. L.) 9 (2013), 245-268

9. Laurens JE Timmer, Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation: Ill Conceived and Premature? Journal of Private International Law ( J. Priv. Int. L.) 9 (2013), 129-147

10. Johannes Weber, Universal Jurisdiction and Third states in the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation. RabelsZ 75 (2011), 619-644