JUS278-2-A / Comparative Private Law

Part I.

· R. SACCO, Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law, (Part I) 39 Am. J. Comp. Law (1991) , pp. 1-34

· R. SACCO, Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law, (Part II) 39 Am. J. Comp. Law (1991) , pp. 343-401

· R. A. MAC DONALD, Unitary Law Re-form, Pluralistic Law Re- Substance: Illuminating Legal Change, 67 Louisiana Law Review, (2007) pp. 1113-1160

· G. AJANI , Transplants, Legal Borrowings and Reception, Encyclopedia of Law & Society - Sage Pub., New York, 2007 pp. 1-8

· W. TWINING, Generalizing about Law: the Case of Legal Transplants, The Tilburg-Warwick Lectures, 2000 pp. 1-52

· F. SCHAUER, The Politics and Incentives of Legal Transplantation, CID Working Paper no. 44, Cambridge Mass., April 2000, Law and Development Paper no. 2, pp. 1-21

Part II.

· P. LEGRAND, European Legal Systems are not Converging, 45 Int´l & Comp. L.Q. 55 (1996), pp. 52-81

· K. ZWEIGERT, , H.-J. PUTTFARKEN, Statutory Interpretation - Judicial Style, 44 Tul. L. Rev. (1969-1970), pp. 704-719

· M. W. HESSELINK, The Politics of European Contract Law: Who has an Interest in What Kind of Contract Law for Europe?, 2 Global Jurist Frontiers, (2002), pp. 1-11

· M. WELLS, French and American Judicial Opinions 19 Yale J. Int´l L. 81 (1994), 81-132

· Cour de Cassation Chambre civile 2, Audience publique du 18 décembre 1995

· House of Lords M'alister (or Donoghue) appellant; and Stevenson respondent [1932] AC 562 pp. 1-22

· Supreme Court of California Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Fresno [1944] 150 P.2d 436, pp. 1-5