JUS286-2-A / Constitution and politics

Oppdatert 9. januar 2014

· Karl Harald Søvig, Introduction to Norwegian Constitutional Law (ca 20 pages)

· Hans Petter Graver, "Mission Impossible: Supranationality and National Legal Autonomy in the EEA Agreement", 7 European Foreign Affairs Review, 2002 p. 73-90

· Thomas Burri og Benedikt Pirker, «Constitutionalization by Assosiaction? The Doubtful Case of the European Economic Area», Yearbook of European Law, 2013 p. 1-23

· "The Two EEA Courts - a Norwegian Perspective", i: EFTA Court (ed.), Judicial Protection in the European Economic Area, Stuttgart 2012, p. 187-210

· Jørn Øyrehagen Sunde, "Dissenting Votes in the Norwegian Supreme Court 1965-2000. A legal cultural analysis", 1 Rechtkultur, 2012 s. 59-73.

· Bellamy, Richard, (2013) “Constitutional Democracy”. The Encyclopedia of Political Thought, Michael T. Gibbons (ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2272188

· Sweet, Alec Stone. "Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy." West European Politics 25.1 (2002): 77-100.

· Siri Gloppen, B. Wilson, R Gargarella, E Skaar M. Kinander Law and Power in Latin America and Africa (Palgrave, 2010) Chapter 2

• Tushnet, Mark. "Constitutional Foundation: Constitution-Making: An Introduction." Tex. L. Rev. 91 (2013): 1983-2015.

• Jon Elster: “Clearing and Strengtening the Channels of Constitution-making” in Tom Ginsburg (ed) Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge Universtiy Press 2002. pp 15-30

• Sajó, András. "Constitution without the constitutional moment: A view from the new member states." Int'l J. Const. L. 3 (2005): 243.

• Grendstad, Gunnar, William R. Shaffer, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2010. Revealed Preferences of Norwegian Supreme Court Justices. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 123 (1):73-101.

• Grendstad, Gunnar, William R. Shaffer, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2011. When justices disagree. The Influence of Ideology and Geography on Economic Voting on the Norwegian Supreme Court. Retfærd 34 (1):3-22.

Norsk debatt:

• Føllesdal, Andreas. 2013. Much Ado about Nothing? Claims about political appointment to the Norwegian Supreme Court - and what to do - and not to do - about it. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 126 (3):365-371.

• Shaffer, William R., Gunnar Grendstad, and Eric N. Waltenburg. 2014. Standards of interpretation. Rejoinder to Føllesdal. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap (forthcoming)

• Roberto Gargarella, Pilar Domingo and Theuis Roux Courts and Social Transforamtion (Ashgate 2006) “Conclusion” pp 255-281

• Alicia Yamin and Siri Gloppen Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health (HLS Human Rights Programme Series with Harvard University Press 2011) Chapters 1,2,13

• Ran Hirschl: The Nordic counternarrative: Democracy, human development, and judicial review Int J Constitutional Law (2011) 9 (2): 449-469 doi:10.1093/icon/mor034

• Cichowski, Rachel, Civil Society and the European Court of Human Rights (2010). APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1643604

• Grewal, Sharanbir, and Erik Voeten. "The Politics of Implementing European Court of Human Rights Judgements." Available at SSRN 1988258 (2012)

Samlet sidetall: 470