The course was structured into -- lectures -- reading assignments and joint discussion of literature (paper hour) -- course assignments (programming) More information about the structure of the course can be found at http://www.ii.UiB.no/vis/teaching/visualization/
In the beginning a number of students registered for the course, but only seven really started -- the system reports some eleven students who registered, but I did not see four of them; not even once. After very short time, one student quit and did not continue. With the remaining six students the course worked very well with very good involvement of the students. Mid-semester another student quit which was really unfortunate. She thought that the course was too demanding given her education up to this time. The remaining five students finished successfully. Their involvement in the course was great and also the exam was C, B, or A in all cases. So that's positive.
The FS-report says it anyway: A: 2, B: 1, C: 2
?? (I don't understand what I should enter here)
Since there's no good standard text book on visualization (yet), selected articles have been provided through the MiSide web portal as well as PDF copies of the slides which were used in the lecture.
The room used 2142 (HiB) was perfectly well suited. The equipment available was just fine.
--
An extensive questionaire has been offered to the students and three students returned their answers. The compiled answers fill three pages (too much to post here, but available on request).
Most comments were very positive -- that's nice! Generally, the students thought that the course was too much work (not surprising).
The course was given in this new ''normal'' setting (before the course was given in a special arrangement with blocked lectures from abroad) for the first time and set up during the semester. The course plan was slightly adapted compared to the original plan, but not very much. It worked quite well, I would say.
INF252 on visualization was a really nice experience. A small group of engaged students who did good work and achieved quite a respectable level wrt. the topic. Most feedback was very positive, only the amount of work necessary was considered high. In total, the course went very well, I would say.